Biyernes, Agosto 28, 2015

Underspending dragging GDP?

Senate President Franklin M. Drilon today expressed concern about the country’s ability to meet its target economic growth this year, which he said is being dragged down by what continues to be an “alarming” trend of government underspending. 
  
The Senate leader’s statement came after the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) and the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) on Thursday reported the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) for the second quarter of 2015 at 5.6%, which is way below the 6.4% it registered in the same period last year.

Drilon asked the country’s economic managers if the target GDP of 7% to 8% is still within reach, “when our present economic performance indicates otherwise?”

While he wishes to be as optimistic as the country’s economic managers, Drilon said that it is becoming more apparent now that the full year target of 7%-8% GDP is a “pipe dream.”

“The higher GDP target is ideal, but at the rate things are going it would be unattainable. It would mean the economy has to grow by at least 8.7% in the remaining quarters in order to achieve the minimum growth rate target of 7%, which is impossible to achieve,” said Drilon.

He noted that even Socioeconomic Planning Secretary and NEDA Director-General Arsenio M. Balisacan had earlier said that “the higher end of the 2015 goal would be difficult to achieve.”

“I am therefore asking our Cabinet members who lead the government’s economic cluster to conduct a serious re-assessment of our current standing, including a realistic description of what the country could and could not achieve for this year. Only then can we move forward and come up with the necessary solution,” Drilon said.

He pointed to government underspending as one of the key areas which require “immediate action,” citing that government spending represents nearly 20% of the Philippine’s annual GDP.  

“The 3.9% increase in government consumption in this quarter is a welcome development, but it is obvious much more needs to be done in terms of fixing issues on spending such as bureaucratic bottlenecks, especially in the public infrastructure sector,” Drilon said. – END



Miyerkules, Agosto 26, 2015

Transcript of Bombo Radyo Interview with Senate President Franklin M. Drilon by Jun Desca

Q: Sir makikibalita lang po kami sa mga mahahalagang balita sa Senado ngayong linggo, lalo na sa mga panukalang batas na tinututukan ngayon ng Senado.

SPFMD: Bago iyan ay narinig ko yung reporter niyo sa House ang problema doon sa quorum.

Q: Parang napansin din po ata iyan ng Minority sa Senado kahapon.

SPFMD: Wala naman kaming problema sa pag roll call. Araw-araw nagro-roll call kami. Mayroon namang sapat na mayorya. Of course, kapag humahaba na ang mga debate sa mga batas, ay yung iba ay may appointment at umaalis.

Ngunit two days ago, nung pagpasok ni Senator Enrile, ni-remind niya ang aming mga kasamahan na kailangan nandoon tayo lalo kapag importanteng panukalang batas ang pinagdedebatehan. At sinabi niya bilang opposition, nasa kapangyarihan po nila na question-in ang quorum.

Ako po ay nagpasalamat kay Senator Enrile na kanyang niremind ang aming mga kasamahan kapag may importanteng debate na nandoon tayo sa session the whole time. Pero in terms of quorum po, ay wala kaming masyadong problema.

Ngayon sa tanong mo, ay sa Senado po ay patuloy po ang aming debate tungkol dun sa Bangsamoro Basic Law. Pinagusapan yung taxation powers at ang block grant na tinatawag natin, na binu-budget po para sa Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, yung mga kapangyarihan ng Bangsamoro Juridical Entity – yung pamahalaan doon, yung regional government, yaan po ay inisa-isa.

Kahapon pinagusapan din namin yung mga tratado para sa  mga tax treaty sa Turkey at sa Germany, para po sa maayos natin  yung mga problema natin ukol sa pagbubuwis sa ating mga kababayan na nabubuhay sa ibang bansa.

Q:  Yung national budget po ba on track tayo? Hindi po ba iyan naapektuhan nung mga debate sa iba pang mahahalagang batas na tinututukan ng Senado?

SPFMD: Hindi naman. Yaan po ay nasa komite, sa katunayan po ay sa susunod na linggo ay ang nakasalang sa ating budget hearing ay ang budget ng Department of Public Works and Highways, na may P394.5 billion na alokasyon sa DPWH. Alam mo importante po ito dahil malaking kritisismo sa ating bansa ay ang kakulangan sa imprastraktura, at kakulangan ng mga kalsada. Kaya po mayroong sa susunod na taon, 13 porsyento ng kabuuang budget ng bansa sa 2016 ay mapupunta sa DPWH. Ito ay isa sa pinakamataas na budget sa DPWH. May pagtaas ito ng 27 porsyento ang budget ng DPWH kung ihahambing at titingnan natin ang budget nito ngayong taon. 

Q: Itong usapin na pinatitigil na ni Pangulong Aquino ang pagbubukas ng mga balikbayan boxes ng OFWs, may mga hindi po kuntento sa naging aksyon ng Pnagulo. Diyan sa Senado, may concern po ba sa umiiral na polisiya ngayon ng Bureau of Customs?

SPFMD: Maraming resolusyon na finifile sa Senado na ibig maimbestiga kung bakit ganito ang polisiya ng Bureau of Customs sa balikbayan boxes. Yung pong aming pinaguusapan na Customs and Tariff Modernization Act, ito po ay inisponsor na ni Senator Sonny Angara, isa po sa mga probisyon niyan ay yung mga tinatawag na maliliit na customs, tariff and duties o ang tawag sa batas ay “de minimis.”

Ibig sabihin niyan it’s no longer worth it to try  and collect kung mas malaki pa ang magagastos mo to collect these amounts sa mga balikbayan – ayan po ay titingnan namin kung at what level dapat huwag na buwisan ang mga balikbayan boxes.

Pangalawa, nagbibigay din iyan ng pondo for the Customs modernization, para hindi na po manual, dahilan sa maraming magbubukas ay talagang may corruption at mabagal kaya dapat may sapat na pondo para sa mas maraming X-Ray scanner.

Ito po ang aming tulong na magagawa, para sa permanenteng solusyon. Ako po hindi ako sangayon sa Bureau of Customs na policy na bubuksan ang balikbayan boxes. There must be other ways na maaring mahuli ang mga ini-ismuggle diyan. Ang dapat tingnan, yung mga big-time smugglers, huwag yung mga balikbayan boxes na bubuksan pa po.  Sa akin po, hindi po ako pabor sa polisiya ng BOC diyan sa balikbayan boxes.  
          
Q: Sir mamaya po ay magbubukas ulit yung Senate Blue Ribbbon Subcommitttee sa imbestigasyon sa Makati – mahigit sa isang taon na po ang imbestigasyon – kayo po ba ay may komunikasyon sa liderato ng Senate Blue Ribbon subcommittee kung kelan matatapos ito, at ano pa ba ang kailangan nilang impormasyon – o hahayaan na lang, dahil sabi nila may bago daw silang impormasyon?

Pangalawang tanong po, kahapon po ay may pinapaaresto po silang panibagong yung sinasabing hindi dumadalo sa pagdinig. Yaan po ba ay dumaan na sa inyong tanggapan?

SPFMD: Opo, dumaan na po sa aking tanggapan, pinapaaresto po yung mga hindi sumisipot sa hearing. Alam mo, kaya tumatagal ito ay dahil sa ayaw humarap, yung mga tinatawag ng Blue Ribbon Committee na humarap, sila Limlingan, at yung isang lady na secretaryna  si Baloloy, ay nagtatago. Kaya hindi makumple-kumpleto ang imbestigasyon ay yung mga tao na ay hindi humaharap. Kaya naman aming ipina-pahuli na sa Senado at mag-testify at pagkatapos ay pwede nang isara ang imbestigasyon. 
Ang hirap naman na ide-defy lang nila ang orders ng Blue Ribbon Committee, kailangan ay humarap sila at magtestigo, para masara na. ###
  





Huwebes, Agosto 20, 2015

Drilon to Umali: Don’t interfere with the affairs of the Senate

Senate President Franklin M. Drilon today chided Oriental Mindoro Representative Reynaldo Umali for interfering in the internal affairs of the Senate.

Drilon’s statement came after Umali proposed a major overhaul of the Senate committees once Senators Grace Poe and Francis Escudero choose to run for a higher office in 2016.

Drilon, also the Liberal Party’s vice chairman, said his partymate Umali’s statements “constitute a serious breach in the long-standing tradition of inter-parliamentary courtesy.”

Drilon said that Umali, as a fellow member of Congress, would do well to stop meddling on the internal matters of the Senate."

“I strongly urge my partymate Umali to observe inter-parliamentary courtesy and mind his own business. I am sure that my partymate knows better than to act like a blabbermouth,” said Drilon.

“We must refrain from making statements which do not help the already toxic political environment,” he added.

Drilon said he is strongly opposed to Umali’s assertion that prospective candidates in the 2016 presidential elections Poe and Escudero should be stripped of their respective chairmanships of Senate committees.

“Our legislative work in the Senate is immune from partisanship, and I will see to it that it stays that way,” Drilon stressed.

“His suggestion is simply absurd, given that we still have to finish a lot of our legislative priorities in the 16th Congress. We have a close and healthy working relationship in the Senate as evident from a number of measures the chamber has continuously passed,” said Drilon.

The Senate chief said that with less than a year left, he still expects the senators and their respective committees to continue working on pending reform measures of national importance that the Senate has promised the public.

The Senate leader said that regardless of their political plans, he is confident that Poe and Escudero will continue to effectively man their posts, given the crucial functions these committees to public interests.  

Poe chairs three Senate committees—public information and mass media; public order and dangerous drugs; and the joint committee on the Human Security Act, while Escudero, is at the helm of three Senate committees—environment and natural resources, and joint committees on the Clean Water Act and Chainsaw Act. - END









Miyerkules, Agosto 19, 2015

Transcript of Bombo Radyo with Senate President Franklin M. Drilon with Jun Desca

Q:  I understand na itong nakaraang araw ay maraming naipasang panukalang batas sa Senado.

SPFMD: Unang-una yung modernization act ng PAGASA. Naglaan kami ng P3 billion na mangagaling sa contribution ng PAGCOR sa National Treasury para po ma-modernize natin ang equipment sa PAGASA. P3 billion po ito, ito po ang ating itinabi at inappropriate para sa modernization ng kagamitan ng PAGASA. Halimbawa yung 5 bagong Doppler radars magmula sa Aparri hanggang sa Surigao, iyan ang ilalagay natin diyan, para makapag-silbi ng husto ang PAGASA, nakailangang kailangan natin ngayon dahil panahon na naman ng mga bagyo sa ating bansa.

Pangalawa po yung tinatawag natin na Naval Architecture Modernization Bill, kung saan ipinasa natin itong panukalang batas na magmomodernize sa propesyon ng naval architecture sa Pilipinas sa pamamagitan ng pagsama ng mga subjects sa naval architecture sa mga itinuturo sa engineering schools  sa ating bansa.

Q: Paano po iyan, nung sumuko si Senator Enrile ay siya ang Senate Minority Leader, babalik po ba siya as Minority Leader?

SPFMD: Tama po iyan, dahil si Senator Sotto ay “acting” Minority Leader lamang, kaya pagbalik ni Senator Enrile babalik po siya sa kanyang posisyon bilang Minority Leader. Ang sabi po ng aming Minority Leader ay sa Lunes daw ay mag-rereport na si Enrile sa session hall, dahilan po sa binigyan siya ng bail ng Korte Suprema at ngayong araw – sa pagkalam ko - ay hihintayin sa Sandiganbayan to actually post the bail.

Q: Siguro naman magiging malaking tulong si Senator Enrile sa mga panukalang batas, lalo na’t hinihimay na ang kontrobersiyal na Bangsamoro Basic Law.

SPFMD: Tama po iyan. Given the fact na malawak na ang karanasan ni Senator Enrile sa pamahalaan, makakatulong po siya sa pagtingin sa mga importanteng panukalang batas, yung sinabi mo nga na Bangsamoro Basic Law. Malawak na po ang karanasan ni Senator Enrile, at titingnan niya po iyan nang husto,sa palagay ko at sasali siya sa debate to come up with a better legislation.

Q: Namayapa na po si dating Sen. Butz Aquino. Ano na po ba ang ginagawa ng Senado para sa kanya?

SPFMD: Kahapon po ay nagpasa kami ng resolution to express our condolences at the demise of our colleague Senator Butz Aquino, at mamayang hapon ay mayroong kaming misa sa Senado, at dadalhin po doon ang labi yung urn – dahil crinemate po siya – dadalhin sa Senado.

Kaya po aking inaayanyayahan ang ating mga kaibigan na ibig makiramay sa pamilya ni Senator Butz Aquino na pumunta sa Senado mamayang alas-dos ng hapon at doon po ay may misa at aming ibibigay ang resolution of condolences sa pamilya ni Senator Butz Aquino.

Alam niyo po, ating maalala si Senator Butz noong August 21 movement, na siya ang nagumpisa, siya po ay nanawagan sa mga kababayan na pumunta sa EDSA, kaya po nagkaroon ng EDSA Revolution. Sa pagka-senador talagang inalagaan niya ang ating mga kooperatiba, dahil siya ay naniniwala na kapag umulad ang mga kooperatiba ay mas uunlad at mawawalan po ng mahirap sa ating bansa.

Pangatlo, siya rin po ang tumayong on his principle na hindi dapat manatili ang mga basing militar dito sa ating bansa. Bumoto po siya na hindi maipagpatuloy ang mga US military bases dito dahilan sa kanyang paninindigan. Nawalan po siya ng boto sa Central Luzon, dahilan sa maraming kababayan ni Butz Aquino ang hindi sangayon sa kanyang desisyon, dahil marami po ang nawalan ng trabaho, pero si Senator Butz po ay dahilan sa kanyang paniniwala na hindi na dapat magkaroon ng mga base militar ang Amerikano sa Clark at sa Subic, ay siya po ay bumoto ng “No” sa Senado on the ratification of the US Bases Treaty. ###



Martes, Agosto 18, 2015

Transcript of Ambush Interview with Senate President Franklin M. Drilon

Q: On the passing of former Senator Butz Aquino

SPFMD: We will pass the resolution condoling the family, which we will hand to the family tomorrow when we have the mass at the morning.

Q: How do you remember Senator Butz?

SPFMD:  He stood for his principles. First, I had interactions with him as Executive Secretary. But I do remember, that one of the issues of the time was the ratification of the treaty for the US bases, and Butz took a principled position. He voted “No.”

He may have realized that this would alienate his supporters in the Central Luzon, but nevertheless he believed  that he has to stand by his principles and that cost him hundreds of thousands of votes, which resulted to his being no. 24th in the elections at that time.  So I remember him as a principled man.

I remember he believes strongly in cooperatives as a way of uplifting the poverty in the countryside. He was a very conscientious proponent of rural development through cooperatives. In that sense, the cooperative movement in our country has lost a champion.

Q: Any possible return of JPE to the Senate?

SPFMD: We will honor, as we have always done, we will follow the orders of the Supreme Court. I haven’t received them yet.

Q:  Can he go back to work?

SPFMD: Certainly, if he is granted bail then he can come to the Senate. He has never abandoned work, anyway, he continued to perform the functions of a senators with except the attendance of sessions, which he could not do. ###  


Statement by Senate President Franklin M. Drilon on the Supreme Court's ruling granting the petition for bail of Senator Juan Ponce Enrile


"We respect the decision of the Supreme Court granting bail to Senator Juan Ponce Enrile. The Senate will always respect, follow and implement every decision of the courts. We will abide by the legal processes as we have always done in the past." -End- 




Huwebes, Agosto 13, 2015

Transcript of Ambush Interview with Senate President Franklin M. Drilon

Q: You wanted Secretary Abad to specify items in the special purpose funds?

SPFMD:  Yes, to answer all of these unfounded allegations of a lump sum, I asked him to specify the areas where it is logical to specify.  Number one, the main calamity fund. You cannot specify that because you would not know how many calamities would visit us. In so far as the Yolanda Rehabilitation is concerned, you can specify that. Dahil matagal na itong Yolanda, yung rehabilitation fund should be disaggregated and sasabihin kung saan napunta. Hindi lang yung sasabihin natin, school building, saan mapunta yung school building? Hindi natin pwedeng sabihing housing, saan mapupunta yung housing? Kaya nila yun, kasi may mga plano na.

Now, yung sa calamity fund, hindi talaga pwede. May lump sum sa death benefits, eh kung gusto nilang i-specify, sabihin na kung sino ang mamamatay para aming ma-disaggregate, kasi lump sum yun. Kung sasabihin nila na ito ay bawal, pwede naming i-disaggregate, pero sila ang magbigay ng pangalan kung sino ang entitled sa death benefits. You can’t push this to its illogical conclusions, so let us be rational about this. You keep on saying lump sum, alin yung lump sum? As I said, you cannot disaggregate death benefits unless you are going to tell us who are going to die.

You cannot disaggregate calamity, unless you tell us how many are coming. Yung iba, dapat i-specify. Yung sinasabing entitlement ng local government units on certain laws, that can be specified and they have agreed to disaggregate it. For example, the share of a local government on a mining company insofar as excise taxes is concerned. You cannot immediately specify because hindi mo naman alam kung magkano ang ibabayad ng mining company in terms of the excise tax from which the LGU will share.

What will you do? Ok, I was suggesting to them, you make an approximation of what this LGU is entitled to, subject to the condition that these are just estimates and the final figure will come when the treasurer now certifies as to how much is the taxes paid. Mga ganoon na mga instances. It is easy to shout lump sum but if you look at the specifics, you will realize that you can only do so to a certain extent.

Q: Under SC ruling, hindi po completely pinagbabawal yung lump sum?

SPFMD: Ang pinagbabawal ng Korte Suprema is the post-budget participation of the legislators. Yun ang pinagbawal at wala sa budget. Yung lump sum pinag-uusapan natin. The Supreme Court never intended that all the lump sum should be disaggregated because they realized it is impractical to do so.  

Q: Hahaba yung budget sir? 

SPFMD: Hindi lang yun, hindi mo ma-predict kung sino ang mamamatay, di ba? So sa lump sum on the death benefits, merong nakalagay. Death benefits of barangay officials. They say this is a lump sum. Eh di sabihin natin kung sino ang mamamatay.

Q: Pareho lang ba yung lump sum appropriations sa 2016? Meron din sa 2015 budget?

SPFMD: Pareho lang. I am explaining to you what the lump sum is all about.

Q: So yung issue na finile sa Korte Suprema, confident kayo na mababasura lang yun?

SPFMD: Yes.

Q: What did Justice Carpio want to discuss with the Senate yesterday?

SPFMD: He briefed us on the need to pay particular attention and to unite everybody in the position taken by the Executive Branch particularly on the arbitration because we have no capacity to contest China economically or militarily. Therefore, our remedy is to enforce the Code of Conduct in international law. That is why we have the arbitration.

It is the hope of Justice Carpio that once the decision is rendered, hopefully in our favour, we should avail of all avenues to enforce it, including particularly the United Nations. But, the principal purpose of the lecture is to brief the senators and to make sure that we are all united insofar as the course of action taken is concerned. What he in fact is saying is what the government need is hope. Because right now, the Chinese government has about seven reclamations over the South China Sea.

Q: No discussion about the SET?

SPFMD: No, in fact nobody asked. That was the request, that was upon the initiative of Justice Carpio, that we have this briefing.

Q: So challenge po ito sa next presidency?

SPFMD: Yes, this is a challenge for the next administration to pursue these claims that we have, because Justice Carpio does not expect a decision until about middle of next year.

Q: On the BBL sessions in the Senate, you said that it will take about 11 sessions to wrap up the debates.

SPFMD: I do not want to impose any deadlines, because these can be twisted. We will see to what extent are the debates. ###             


Transcript of DZRH Interview with Senate President Franklin M. Drilon

Q:  Kahapon daw po ay nagsimula na diyan pagdebatehan sa Senado ang 2016 national budget.

SPFMD: Kahapon po ay sinimulan na po namin ang pagdinig sa 2016 budget, P3 trillion po ito, 15 porsyento ang pag-taas mula sa kasalukuyang budget. Ang isa po sa magandang features ng budget na ito ay meron po para sa mga kawani ng pamahalaan, mga mahigit sa P67 billion para sa merit increases and across-the-board salary adjustment sa susunod na Enero 1. 

Kapag naipadala na po sa amin ng Malakanyang yung Salary Standardization Law IV na draft, o yung “SSL IV”, pag-pasa po ng budget, ay magkakaroon po ng salary adjustment ng mga mahigit sa P50 billion sa kabuuan, at mayroon pa pong mahigit sa P17 billion na para sa merit increases, kaya sa kabuuan po ay P67 billion ang nakalaan sa budget para sa sahod ng ating mga manggagawa sa pamahalaan.

Ang ating Department of Education ay ang may pinakamalaking budget, mahigit po sa P435.9 billion ang nakalaan para sa ating DepEd. Ito po ay para sa ating mga silid-aralan, mga libro, mga bagong guro, at mga scholarship programs para sa mga high-school students na nagkakahalaga ng P21.2 billion.

So ito po ay talagang isang budget na talagang diretso sa tao ang kanyang benepisyo, at ito po ay sa aking tingin ay makakatulong sa buong sambayanan.  

Q:  Bakit po tila sa huling yugto na ng administrasyon “bumubuhos ang grasya” at malaking budget na ang bumubuhos doon sa mga sweldo ng mga guro?  

SPFMD:  Hindi po tama, at hindi po totoo iyan. Binibigyan ko ng diin- ito na ang Salary Standardization IV – pang-apat na beses na po ito. Regular na binabantayan ni Pangulong Noynoy ang pagtaas ng sahod ng ating mga kawani sa pamahalaan.

Inuulit ko po, ito na ang Salary Standardization Law IV –pang-apat na. Hindi lang po ngayon tinataasan ang sahod ng ating mga kawani sa pamahalaan, kundi may ilang taon na rin po ang nakaraan.
Q: So talagang tama lang po ang timing?

SPFMD: Kahit timing man po o hindi, talagang itataas po ang sahod ng ating mga manggagawa. 

Q: Yung sa budget po, yung underspending sa gobyerno, paano po ba ito dinepensahan ng ating mga economic managers?

SPFMD: Ang sabi po nila, talagang may problema. Ang gagawin po nila, they will adopt measures, magkakaroon po ng mga gagawing patakaran para mapabilis ang ating gastos, ang pag-gastos ng budget.

Ang dahilan, at ibig ko lang ipaabot sa ating mga kababayan, 20 porsyento ng ating ekonomiya ay nag-rerely sa government spending. Ibig sabihin, kung ang ating ekonomiya, ang kontribusyon ng pamahalaan ay 20 porsyento. Ito po yung mga sahod, yung infrastructure, mga health services.

Ngayon, kung hindi natin magagastos yung in-authorize under sa budget ay hindi makakapagbigay ng sapat na contribution ang public sector o pamahalaan, kaya hindi ganoong kalaki ang ating makikita sa pag-unlad ng ating ekonomiya. Actually sa first quarter of this year, 5.2 percent lang ang pag-lago ng ating ekonomiya.

Kaya dapat po, kung ano man ang authorized na budget, dapat gastusin. Of course, babantayan ng COA (Commission on Audit) iyan at dapat tamang pag-gastos lamang.  Ngunit ang importante, whatever is budgeted ay dapat gastusin para lumago ang ating ekonomiya.  

Q: Kahapon naisponsor na sa Senado ang panibagong bersiyon ng BBL (Bangsamoro Basic Law). Masusunod po ba ang pangkahalatang kagustuhan ng ating mga mamamayan?

SPFMD: Tama po iyan. Kahapon po ay aming nasimulan na ang sponsorship speech sa Senado at sa Lunes ay magsisimula na ang debate at asahan po ng ating mga kababayan – unang una ang aming layunin dito ay ang ating Saliganag Batas ay masusunod; pangalawa, ang kapayapaan po ng Mindanao ang ating hinahangad, para po magkaroon po ng dagdag na investment duon po sa Mindanao at magkaroon ng trabaho yung mga ating kababayan sa Mindanao.

Ito po ang aming mga pakay at amin pong  sisikapin na matapos lalo na sa madaling panahon itong Bangsamoro Basic Law. Uulitin ko lang, aming sisiguraduhin na ito ay sasang-ayon sa Saligang Batas.

Q: Malayo daw po ito sa bersiyon na gusto na mangyari ng MILF?

SPFMD: Sa akin pong tingin, syempre may mga binago kami, halimbawa, yung police siniguro natin na sasangayon sa ating structure ng ating PNP na kung saan ang National Police Commission ang siyang may control sa ating national police force, ayon sa Saligang Batas. Yung COA, yung COMELEC, atin pong inilagay sa tama at iyan po ang significant changes sa version ng Senado.

Q: Nagkaroon daw po ng briefing si Associate Justice Antonio Carpio diyan sa Senado doon sa issue ng West Philippine Sea. Ano po ang sustansya ng inyong napag-usapan?

SPFMD: Ang sinabi po ni Justice Carpio ay dapat pag-ingatan natin ito at talagang dapat ipag-laban natin. Ang ginagawa ng gobyerno ay tama na pumunta sa arbitration, dahilan sa hindi naman natin kayang labanan sa military ang Tsina, na malaki, hindi natin kaya.

Pinakita niya sa briefing niya yung mga itinatayong mga reclamation na ang suspetya ay base militar, mga reclamations na ginagawa sa South China Sea na nag-tataas ng tensiyon dito sa atin. Kaya kanyang hinihiling na ang ASEAN ay mag-buo at maging united, at iharap sa buong mundo itong problema na hinaharap ng ASEAN sa South China Sea. ###

  

Biyernes, Agosto 7, 2015

Speech of Senate President Franklin M. Drilon Makati Business Club August 6, 2015


 IMPROVED ECONOMIC LANDSCAPE,
INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT

Esteemed officers and members of the Makati Business Club, friends, ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon.

It’s a great honor and pleasure to speak before you once again. Since we are now on the last year of the Aquino administration, let me take this opportunity to report to you on what Congress has done for the last five years, and what it intends to do in the last year.

Today, the Philippine economic ship is sailing smoothly and steadily the course that the Aquino administration charted five years ago. Early on, the direction is clear.

The pursuit of development must be anchored on good governance.
Indeed, much has changed in the past five years. The Philippines has become a rising star in Asia. It is now in the radar of the business and finance community because of its remarkable economic growth, investment grade ratings, strong macroeconomic indicators, political stability, and earnest pursuit of good governance. The optimism and confidence of the international community are reflected in the significant improvements in our Global Competitiveness and Ease of Doing Business rankings.

The Congress has been an active partner in the pursuit of difficult but meaningful reforms. In the past five years, the Senate has never wavered in its commitment to help lay the foundation of a healthy economy, and create an environment marked by political stability and strong institutions, and equitable distribution of social services.
We have always underscored the importance of transparency and accountability, developing our human capital and building world-class infrastructure to attract much needed foreign investments and generate jobs for our people.

The Senate did not waste time to respond to numerous challenges that were thrown our way.

On Good Governance

During the first SONA of the President in 2010, he cited the excesses of the GOCCs, as in the case of the MWSS. In response,and on our own initiative,I wrote and worked on the we enactment ofed the GOCC Governance Act and made state owned enterprises instruments of national progress, instead of being milking cows. In 2013, the GOCCs remitted a total of P28 Billion in dividends to the national coffers, and in 2014, over P32 Billion.

Cases in the Sandiganbayan take five to seven years to resolve. To enable the speedy disposition of corruption cases, we amended the Sandiganbayan Law.

We amended the Anti-Money Laundering Act to expand the list of entities required to report covered and suspicious transactions to the Anti-Money Laundering Council. We also authorized freeze orders and inquiries on bank deposits upon order of the court based on ex parte petition by the Council.

On the Economy

To make our country more competitive, we passed measures to stimulate the economy and attract foreign investments, thus creating more jobs.

On the initiative of the Senate and the House of Representatives, we passed the Philippine Competition Act. For more than 20 years the bill was stuck in Congress. Finally, we now have a competition policy that outlaws and penalizes anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and anti-competitive mergers and acquisitions.

In 2013, the President asked Congress to “amend the Cabotage Law in order to foster greater competition and to lower the cost of transportation for our agricultural sector and other industries”. We responded by amending the Cabotage Law to achieve these goals.
On our own initiative, we allowed the Full Entry of Foreign Banks by authorizing them to acquire and invest up to 100% of the voting stock of a domestic bank. My recent conversation with BSP Governor Tetangco indicated that there are four banks which indicated their interest, and in fact, are putting up branches here. We also enacted a law that allowed foreign investors to own 60% of the voting stock in rural banks.

To boost our tourism industry, we exempted Foreign Carriers from paying, on a reciprocity basis, the common carrier’s and value added tax for the transport of passengers.

To strengthen the insurance industry and make it more resilient to shocks, we enacted the Revised Insurance Code, which imposed more stringent capitalization requirements.

To promote the competitiveness of our sugarcane industry through various productivity improvement programs, such as block farm, farm support and farm mechanization, we passed the Sugarcane Industry Development Act.


On Employment 

More than 80,000 Filipino seafarers faced the threat of losing their jobs in EU-flagged vessels because of our failure to comply with the international convention on seafarers. We, in Congress, took it upon ourselves to pass the MARINA Law.

Last year, the European Union threatened to ban Philippine marine and fisheries products. This threatened the livelihood of our fisherfolk. Congress again responded by amending the Fisheries Code to comply with international standards and strengthen our laws against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. This also redounded to the benefit of Filipino traders who can now export to EU markets at zero tariff using the Generalized System of Preferences Plus (GSP+), more than 6,000 products such as processed fruits, textiles, chemicals, and coconut and marine products. I am proud to say that due to Congress’ swift action in passing the law, the Philippines is the only ASEAN country to be accepted in GSP+.

We also did not neglect the welfare of the highly-paid business executives who are members of the Makati Business Club. You are among those who have complained of our outdated tax exemptions, which were last set in 1992.Kawawa naman kayo. So, for you my dear friends, to restore your purchasing power, which was eroded due to inflation, we raised the tax exemption ceiling for your13th Month Pay and Other Benefits from P30,000 to P82,000.

On Health

We have not neglected the social needs of our people.
For more than ten years, our Excise Taxes on Tobacco and Alcohol favored certain brands. We responded with the passage of the Sin Tax Reform Law, which, by the way, I sponsored in the Senate and I won by one vote. That one vote made difference in leveling the playing field, and thus, we generated an additional Excise Tax collection of over P50 Billion last year. P37 Billion of this incremental revenue was allocated to enroll 15 million indigent families in Philhealth, and cover our senior citizens, which we required under the Amendments to the Expanded Senior Citizens Act.

The National Health Insurance Act demonstrated our commitment to provide health care to each and every Filipino, especially our indigents.
The Graphic Health Warning Act compelled cigarette companies to graphically demonstrate in cigarette packs the deadly effects of smoking. For years, this legislation, again, was stuck in the legislative mill.

The Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Law was one of the most difficult reform measures enacted by Congress. The law provides universal access to medically safe, effective, legal, affordable, and quality reproductive health services, information and education.

On Education

The Enhanced Basic Education Act is now the cornerstone of our learning system. The “K to 12” program – which  covers kindergarten, six years of primary education, four years of junior high school and two years of senior high school – would  provide our students sufficient time to master concepts and skills and develop stronger fundamentals for college education. “K to 12” also aligns our basic education program with those of other countries. And for this, I would like to personally acknowledge the effort of Ramon Del Rosario in pushing for this law.

In the 16th Congress, we further underscored the importance of education as a weapon to fight poverty.

We passed the Iskolar ng Bayan Act, which accords top 10 public high school graduates with scholarships to State Universities and Colleges of their choice. This complements the “Fast-Tracked Science & Technology Scholarship Act” which we passed in 2013.

We passed the Unified Student Financial Assistance System Act (UNIFAST). This will harmonize and expand all student financial assistance programs for tertiary education in both public and private institutions, whether nationally or locally funded.

We also passed the Ladderized Education Act, the Open Learning and Distance Education Act, and the Open High School System Act to enable those who have less in life to have more access to good education.

My dear friends,

I attribute this harvest of remarkable laws first, to the political will of President Aquino and second, largely to the harmonious relations, marked by mutual trust and respect, with our counterparts in the House of Representatives. As you are aware, the leaders of the Senate and the House have been holding regular monthly meetings to define and push forward our legislative agenda.

However, the time is not ripe to congratulate ourselves and pat each other’s back. The road to our goal of inclusive development is long. We must sustain the momentum, build on our gains and continue the pursuit of reforms.

Even if the economic fundamentals are now strong and the outlook is favorable, I assure you that the Senate remains relentless in passing reform measures that will ensure a better business climate.
In the last regular session of the 16th Congress, we will pass the Customs and Tariff Modernization Act (CTMA) that will introduce full automation of customs procedures, and strengthen the Bureau of Customs' risk management, revenue collection and enforcement systems. One of the sticky points of this law is the status of Custom’s brokers. There’s a lot of discussion. We hope to find the language that will be acceptable to all sectors.

We will soon pass the Tax Incentives Monitoring and Transparency Act (TIMTA) to foster transparency and accountability in the grant of fiscal incentives to business entities. The private sector has been pushing for transparency and accountability in government. However, we also wish that the effort to be transparent will extend to all phases of governance, including the private sector. Quite surprisingly, we encountered difficulty in passing TIMTA due to the reservations of the business community in the publication of tax incentives granted to registered business enterprises.

To have an open and transparent environment, we also need the cooperation of the private sector. So I ask: Have an open mind. Be objective. Look at it beyond the bottomline of your financial statements. In the end, this will redound to the benefit of everyone.
We will amend the PDIC charter to introduce much needed reforms that will make PDIC a more effective and efficient insurer of deposits consistent with international best practices.  With a more efficient bank liquidation process, recovery by depositors and creditors of their claims against the assets of the closed bank will be easier.
Since we are an archipelagic country, we need to improve physical and digital connectivity to minimize transaction costs. The Senate passed on third reading the law creating the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) to develop ICT systems and enhance communication services.

It is a shame that we have the most expensive internet rates, but one of the slowest in terms of speed, outpacing only Afghanistan. The creation of the DICT will improve the government’s response to the challenges and issues posed by the rapid developments in ICT, while harnessing the sector’s potential to be one of the strongest drivers of economic growth in the country. 

For efficiency and a smaller budget footprint, the DICT will be created by merging or abolishing existing ICT-related agencies. For instance, all units of the DOTC with functions dealing with communications will be transferred to the DICT. To avoid redundancy, other offices in the bureaucracy will be abolished and their functions, manpower and budget absorbed by the DICT.

We are aware that the Executive Department has some reservations on the creation of a DICT. In the coming weeks, Speaker Belmonte and I will confer with the Executive Secretary to thresh out the concerns of the President. We are not adding any bureaucracy. What we will do is to consolidate the functions of various offices involved in the ICT.

We will scrutinize and pass the 2016 National Budget on time as we have done in the past five years so that the government would not operate on a reenacted budget.I would like to reiterate that pork barrel is a thing of the past. The 2016 National Budget shall be a people-centered budget.We would provide the social services sector its highest budget allocation in the history of our country – P1.1 Trilllion, or 36.8% of the proposed budget.

On social protection, we will allocate P62.7 Billion for the Conditional Cash Transfer that will benefit 4.6 million households. We will fund the supplementary feeding for 2.15 million day-care children, and pension for 1.18 million senior citizens.

On basic education, we shall provide for the construction of more than 47,000 classrooms and workshops for senior high school for K-12, and the purchase of 103 million new textbooks. To address the shortage of teachers, we shall fund close to 80,000 teaching and non-teaching positions.

On universal health care, the proposed budget will cover PhilHealth premiums for approximately 15.4 million indigent families and 2.8 million senior citizens. More than 11,000 rural health units, barangay health stations and health care facilities will be constructed. The budget will also provide for the hiring of more than 21,000 health professionals.

On socialized housing, the budget will provide housing assistance to more than 205,000 victims of Typhoon Yolanda, and to more than 14,000 informal sector families living in danger zones.

We support infrastructure spending because public investment is a driver of the economy, with 20% of our GDP dependent on the expenditure program of the government. Years ago, renowned economist Jeffrey Sachs asserted that to accelerate the growth of the Philippine economy, it has to focus on two important areas: one, the development of human capital and two, the improvement of infrastructure.

We will create a better policy environment for Public-Private Partnerships. To remove the roadblocks in the implementation of critical infrastructure projects, we will address the gaps in our Build-Operate-Transfer Law and the Law on Acquisition of Right-of-Way. These bills will be sponsored in the Senate probably next week, and we hope to pass them in October 2015.

To promote lasting peace and sustainable development in Mindanao, we will enact a Bangsamoro Basic Law that is consistent with our Constitution. Senator Marcos, the chair of our Committee on Local Governments, has committed to file the committee Bill on August 10 and to sponsor it the following day, August 11. By August 17, the Senate will start its debates on the measure. On a daily basis, it will be the first item in our calendar.

I support the enactment of an Anti-Political Dynasty Law. This measure is long overdue.  It’s time to end the long wait. I encourage my colleagues in Congress to give the bill a chance. Let us provide an avenue that will allow for a constructive debate on this very important issue that would bring positive changes in our political system.

To ensure the protection and economic security of the people and communities against natural hazards, we will modernize PAGASA. We will allocate 3 Billion Pesos to be sourced from PAGCOR funds so that we can equip our weather bureau with state-of-the-art facilities and technologies.

The proposed Rationalization of Fiscal Incentives bill has been mired due to disagreements between the Department of Finance and the Department of Trade and Industry.
This cannot continue. I call on DOF Secretary Cesar Purisima and DTI Secretary Gregory Domingo to reconcile their differences in order to facilitate its passage. To recall, the delay in the passage of TIMTA can be attributed to the divergent views of these two departments.

We shall continue in the last regular session of this Congress, and even beyond, the pursuit of good governance and the audacity to implement meaningful reforms, no matter how unpopular they may be.

Ladies and gentlemen, our economic gains are a testament of our collective efforts to bring our beloved country to our development goals on the wings of good governance. However, prosperity should not be enjoyed by a few. Each and every Filipino must be able to partake of the fruits of development. That no Filipino man, woman and child will be left behind. Then, and only then, can we say that the Philippines is truly a developed country and everyone did his share to make this possible.

I am very thankful that the Makati Business Club has joined us on this journey. Be assured that your invaluable and unwavering support is very much appreciated by a grateful nation.

However, the challenge that we must face head on is to protect our gains and ensure the continuity of reforms. Next year, we shall be electing a new set of leaders. Our mission now is to safeguard the reforms we have painstakingly put in place so that neither force nor certain personalities can reverse these even beyond 2016.
I am certain that this is what the Filipino people want. In five years, they have already seen the fruits of these reforms. Now, more than ever, they want these reforms to continue so that their fruits will be enjoyed not only by this generation, but also, the generations yet unborn.

Let me close from where I began. My dear friends, we have gone this far and achieved this much because of the relentless pursuit of good governance, which restored the trust and respect of our people for our government. We gained the confidence of the international community because of our resolute drive to institute transparency and accountability.

There is no turning back.
As the President mentioned in his SONA, “simula pa lang ito”. This is just the beginning.

We are committed to follow the course that we charted. But even now, we can already see in the horizon the dawn of a progressive and prosperous Philippines.

Thank you very much. Mabuhay kayong lahat! –End-